Thursday, October 19, 2006

Rev 20 Part II



THE Revelation of Jesus Christ
Chapter 20
Part II
(VS 4-6)

Then I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was given to them. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand; and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.

The thrones are sat upon by those to rule and reign with Christ. But who are on these thrones?

Speaking to Peter;
28And Jesus said to them, “Truly I say to you, that you who have followed Me, in the regeneration when the Son of Man will sit on His glorious throne, you also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. Matt 19:28 (NASB)

The enthronement of Jesus was an integral part of His ministry. The way to the throne culminated at the cross with the subsequent exaltation to the right hand of the Father. Jesus inherited His Kingdom as a result of His triumph over God’s probation tree as the second Adam (see Tim Brown’s commentary on “Psalm 2”). It is believed Peter was martyred between the years AD 65- AD 67 under Nero. The plain (but necessary) reading would put Peter on one of these mentioned thrones here in Rev 20. Judging apostate Israel as the city of Jerusalem was trampled under by its own people first, and then ultimately destroyed by Titus and his armies in AD 70.

Paul gives some insight to the thrones as well by including the Saints.

2Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? If the world is judged by you, are you not competent to constitute the smallest law courts? 1 Corinthians 6:2 (NASB)

Never the less, we can not precisely know the judges and the judged, other than the righteous in Christ stading in authority over the wicked of the world.

Continuing in chapter 20, there are two lines of thinking that will both be covered from an amillennial perspective; the text reads;

And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God……...(and they came to life)


If we narrow it down to only those who have in fact became martyrs in the mentioned manner, decapitation, we would I think be missing the point1. Most commentators see this as not just a description of the martyrs, but would include all who have died in Christ.
Regardless, it is the souls that are seen here coming to life, as opposed to the ‘bodies’. This event is described as the ‘first resurrection’. Since John says that those who participate are blessed and holy, and it is the souls that come to life and not the bodies, we have two possibilities as to the meaning of the ‘First Resurrection’.

1) The reference here is speaking of those who have been raised spiritual in Christ. The regeneration by the Spirit is said to quicken the soul. Paul uses similar language when describing our new birth.

4But God, being rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, 5even when we were dead in our transgressions, made us alive together £with Christ (by grace you have been saved), 6and raised us up with Him, and seated us with Him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus,

Paul very obviously uses a simile that speaks of our conversion as being ‘made alive’. He as well goes a step further by saying we are raised up with Christ in the heavenly places. Clearly, resurrection type language indeed can be used in conjunction with conversion.

The most glaring passage that would lend this 'first resurrection' to a sinner’s conversion comes from the same author as the text under review. In John chapter 5, Jesus gives an analogy between the ‘two’ resurrections. One spiritually as a sinner is saved, and another general and physical in nature.

24“Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life.
25“Truly, truly, I say to you, an hour is coming and now is, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live.
26“For just as the Father has life in Himself, even so He gave to the Son also to have life in Himself; 27and He gave Him authority to execute judgment, because He is the Son of Man. 28“Do not marvel at this; for an hour is coming, in which all who are in the tombs will hear His voice, 29and will come forth; those who did the good deeds to a resurrection of life, those who committed the evil deeds to a resurrection of judgment. John5:24-29 (NASB)

Jesus uses contrasting metaphors to differentiate the events. The tense in verse 25 is present, they are presently experiencing eternal life as they have been raised from death to life. The use of 'is coming' and the present tense of ‘and now is’, qualifies this first resurrection as spiritual one upon belief and repentance in line with both Ephesians 2 and Revelation chapter 20. Beleivers from then forward are included as having eternal life, and yet still obtaining it; an 'all ready, not yet' theme is introduced. The correlation should become more defined as we continue along in John 5. The exclusiveness of the first resurrection is merged into the physical resurrection in verse 28 only to be separated out again, as those who herd unto eternal life, will inherit that life. All who did not hear the voice unto life, will hear it unto judgment. The first resurrection is simply the selective conversion of the sinner, and the second is general and bodily. The thrones occupied by those who have been made alive by the Spirit would not only have the Saints reigning in the Heavenly realm, but lend credence to the rule of the Christian on Earth. Those of a dominion flavor would indeed lean in this direction.

2) The souls that come to life relate simple to those who have experienced regeneration, and upon death they are immediately ushered into the presence of the Lord. They came to life upon death. Absent from the body, present with the Lord. These ‘myrters’ upon death enter into their position of reigning with Christ. More specifically within the context of the passage (those who hold an early date for the Revelation) of the myrters ruling and judging the 12 tribes of Israel as they are dispersed umong the nations. (Mat 19).

11 It is a trustworthy statement: For if we died with Him, we will also live with Him; 12 If we endure, we will also reign with Him;
2 Tim 2:11-12a (NASB)

This understanding is simply to die is gain as the believer experiences no soul sleep; instead he is whisked into the presence of the Lord to rule and reign with Him for ‘a thousand years’.

those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand;

Also of chapter 20, we find reference to the preceding ‘Beast’, thus tying us to a sequenced event directly following chapter 19.

5The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were completed.

The rest of the dead would be the unbelievers who will be raised bodily unto judgment at the consummation.

This is the first resurrection. 6Blessed and holy is the one who has a part in the first resurrection; over these the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with Him for a thousand years.

The first resurrection referring back to the ‘New Birth’ in conversion or the position with Christ of the person upon natural death. The blessedness of the participants of the first resurrection stands in contrast to the final judgment (2nd death). Those who are born twice, die once. Those who are born once, die twice.

1 Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.
Romans 8:1 (NASB)

The reign of the redeemed is not limited to 1000 years, yet is limited until the general bodily resurrection and final judgment of all men. The thousand years simply means a really long time, a time that is inaugurated at the enthronement of King Jesus, and lasts until the consummation of all things.








Footnotes:

1) Chilton here interestingly relates the term for beheading to John the Baptist specifically. He and those OT prophets he represents.

8 Comments:

Blogger Tim said...

Hank,

Thanks for both of these articles. I decided to post here rather than at both. It seems this is one of the hurdles for me in taking a historicist view, because of what you mentioned concerning the beast and false prophet being cast into the lake of fire, as it appears to be prior to this chapter. I noted your recommendation on 4 views of Revelation and ma putting in my order for it tomorrow. I'm sure it will be a great aid in my study. I am currently looking at several commentaries from preterist, idealist, historcist and dispensational and it is really a chore. The format of that volume seems to parallel the comments, thus making it easier to grasp each view and see it alongside one another.

4:00 PM  
Blogger Hank said...

Tim

Gregg’s book will be helpful. The Historicist view stops at chapter 19 with a pretty short explanation (compared to the others). The Papacy seems to be the main subject of God's foes through out the view with chapter 19 being their complete demise. Indeed, the focus of the Reformers fighting the apostate Church of Rome is very understandable. One can see the areas in which newer systems have borrowed much from this view. I think it is almost human nature to line up our current enemies against the Gospel with those written about in the Revelation, mostly stemming from the dating of the book. Gregg proceeds with chapter 20 only switching to a 3 way format of pre, post or amill positions.

10:29 PM  
Blogger Tim said...

Hank,

So what is your view personally of the Historicist view and do you think it is valid at all? I was leaning that way during my study of Daniel and have to admit to some questions in regards to it, but it seems that there is also some playing with numbers, such as the 1260 days equals years thing and 42 months scenario. I understand they borrow from OT prophecies where a day equals a year, but at least on those occasions the writer actually said that. We weren't left to guess it. Could you elaborate on that a bit?

3:57 AM  
Blogger Hank said...

Well, in a nut shell I would say the pattern of the covenantal structure is my main reason for a Preterist understanding instead of a Historicist view of the Revelation. The ministry of Jesus included warnings to those who were to face the curses of their disobedience. Within this context, the messenger was sent to call the people back to the agreement. If the people were still in continued decadence, the curses were proclaimed. Revelation fits to well not to be the covenantal document calling cures upon the vassal people. Christ proclaimed their disobedience (woe to you). In fact, the people themselves called for their own demise. They declared, 'we have no king but Caesar' thereby openly denying to the nations that they served NOT the God of their fathers, and to prove it, they would kill the messenger. And so they cried, 'let His blood be on us and our children'. And it was.

The continuity of the NT would be drastically changed if the Revelation mostly speaks about the Church in Rome. I think the book itself is consistent about the subject (as is the other portions of the NT that deal with the same subject; i.e. Mat24).

Wrath is poured out by the Lord of the covenant by way of the very one they claimed allegiance to.

This may not be what you were looking for, but I am really beind on some things. I'll seeya.

10:20 AM  
Blogger Gordan said...

Hey, Hank, I second Tim's kudos on these articles. I really appreciate your use of John 5 to clear up the two resurrections thing.

I'm not certain I understand your covenantal argument for preterism, though. Maybe you could elaborate?

I understand the 5-part covenant structure scheme (and agree with it,) so you don't have to go into explaining that.

Why does the fact that the judgment on the Jews in 70 AD was perfectly in accord with God's covenant, then necessitate that the Revelation be about nothing else? That's what I don't get.

Thanks, Vassal.

Gordan

3:09 PM  
Blogger Hank said...

Gordan

Thanks!

The result may not 'necessitate' the main focus of the Revelation but it will lend creedance to it. I want to finish chapter 20 and then deal with it in a summary.

Thanks
Hank

8:34 AM  
Blogger Gordan said...

Hank, I can't wait. It gets even more tricky starting at 20:7, so I await your work eagerly. I just read an explanation tonight of that which I had not considered before, so this is very interesting to me. If you get tired of me, just tell me to go away. :)

5:23 PM  
Blogger Hank said...

Gordan; from one submariner to the son of a submariner:

If I seem short, it’s surly not because I am tired of you! Unfortunately I have had a big change at work. The greatest perk (ok, maybe the third greatest) is that I had quite a bit of time to read, write and study via my computer hidden inconspicuously in my tool box. Well, the powers to be must have figured out the equipment ran to good to need 5 of us. So, being low man in the area, I was transferred to a different one (a different world would classify it better) last week. Any way, my study has been moved to my own personal time (I know, poor me). I am having a hard time adjusting. Now my mornings are juggled between my two home schooled kids, getting the farm (animals) ready for winter (arrhhh!), and my school work which is WAY behind (cringe), my internet career is taking a plummet!! Ok, I am finished sniveling now!!

When I do get the rest of the chapter finished, I am anxious to hear your comments!

10:24 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home